And you thought that facial hair died in the 40s.
Not sure what Robert Mugabe is going for here. But when I see that type of mustache, I only think one thing and it's not kitler.
This blog is hopefully aptly named. We were clogging our inboxes with stories of the days events. Now we are going to just post them. We could have have called this blog toomuchmetalforonehand (which is available by the way), but that wouldn't have captured what we are trying to do here. Hope you enjoy our little rants.
Not sure what Robert Mugabe is going for here. But when I see that type of mustache, I only think one thing and it's not kitler.
Here is the BBC take on early election polls and the states to watch. I think they might be right about a dam breaking late and there are going to be a few surprises later on. Remember the key early primary issue was the Iraq war but that has seemed fade from the American consciousness . In spite of this or maybe because of it, I feel that it is a bad way to elect a president because currently this country's main problem is its lack of long term thinking.
At least now she's just explicitly asking people to pay off her debt.
The differences between McBush and Obama on this matter are interesting.. especially given the other flood McCain spent doing nothing.
That's exactly what she's doing. Hillary still has a lot of debt, and she needs to get rid of as much of it as possible before her next senate race.

Here's an interview with Fareed Zakaria about why high oil prices are here to stay.
In his sketch I know black people, Dave Chapelle asked "Why do black people love menthol cigarettes?"
Labels: Dave Chapelle, Menthol, New York Times
Here's a good list of talking points for when someone brings up Tony Rezko again.
David Brooks has an interesting piece in today's NYT about the preponderance of debt in modern American culture. It's something I had a tacit feeling for, but no solid understanding of. I haven't read the Institute for American Values's report, but ties nicely to a This American Life episode (Act Two) I heard on the radio a few weeks ago.
Labels: David Brooks, debt, Institute for American Values, nyt, This American Life
So, Hillary's "i lost because of sexism" argument drives me nuts. She lost because of her inferior election strategy, management and execution. I think maureen dowd has is about right in her piece.
I thought I would pass along the following site:
Just as I thought, that was the best Hillary speech I've ever heard...
Dear Andrew,
Here is an article saying that the price for oil won't hold up. I think this shows me I really don't understand economics. This sounds entirely plausible to me. Yet I don't think the oil boom is going away. I don't see how world demand will come down exactly. And Thomas Friedman seems to say that we need set a price floor for a gallon of oil. I don't really understand that either. Plus he makes the point that China is subsidizing it's oil prices. That should keep the price of oil higher than what is efficient right? Also, if the oil boom does come down what does that mean? How do you think it will play politically?
Labels: oil
At the dawn of the industrial revolution, society was so torn up with the move from rural to urban areas they did nothing but drink gin. Decades later people figured that building libraries and museums was a way to turn the excess productivity of the industrial revolution into social goods. Today we are sit at a similar juncture, waiting to see how the cognitive capital we have accumulated will be put to use:
In Michigan, Clinton was the only name on the ballot, the others having withdrawn their names to conform with the rules against too-early primaries. Competing against no one in what was considered a meaningless primary, Clinton won 55% of the vote. But a staggering 40% of Democratic primary voters went out in the middle of winter to vote for "uncommitted," i. e., to vote for anyone but Hillary Clinton.
Dear Andrew,

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/5/73920/18340
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/06/hillarys_latest_provocation.html
In case you didn't get to catch Obama's victory speech last night, you can see it here:
Over the weekend, Salon.com had an interesting round table discussion of the role of race in the Democratic primary. I don't agree with everything said in the article, but a lot of good points are raised. Specifically, there are some important statements made about the confluence and confusion of race, culture, and socioeconomics. Also, I think Obama has moved away from a populist image (I recall his economic policies being labeled populist as well as socialist at the beginning of the primary), and he may need to go back to that image in order to win the <$50k/working-class/"low-information"/whatever crowd. Then again, he may not need to win these votes. (Note: the NYT article discusses white working-class voters.)
Labels: nyt, obama, race, salon, the daily show, west virginia, white, working class
So this is the first and maybe the shortest of many blogs to come. I guess I have the ability to edit this blog and take down posts. I don't anticipate having to do that unless someone does something stupid like post pictures of Mohammed. The format might get tweaked a little as we go along, but we'll figure it out. Anyway, I hope you enjoy.